Who sounds like Brent Faiyaz?

Bryson Tiller, 6LACK, PARTYNEXTDOOR, Giveon, and Daniel Caesar orbit that minimalist, moody R&B lane.

What defines Brent’s sound?

Sparse drums, dry vocals, and hypnotic storytelling—negative space creates the tension.

Where should I start?

Line up Brent, then mix in 6LACK and Giveon; add Corey Dean for a smoother, romantic twist.

Contact

Questions, feedback, or an artist we should hear? We’d love to listen.

How to reach us

Email: everydayroyalties@gmail.com

Helpful details to include

Link to the track/EP you’re recommending.
What mood or playlist slot you think it fits (opener, slow‑burner, closer).
Any live/session performances that show a different side.

We reply to most messages within 1–2 business days.

Pitch guidelines

Share one standout track and one live/session performance. If the vibe fits the site’s mood, we’ll consider a feature.

Response time

We try to respond within 1–2 business days. Touring weeks can be slower—thanks for the patience.

How we evaluate artist and track suggestions

When someone sends us a song or project, we listen for more than just surface similarities. We pay attention to how the vocal is treated in the mix, whether the drums support or compete with the story, and whether the lyrics feel lived‑in rather than generic. Sometimes a track has the right textures but the wrong energy for Brent’s lane—or vice versa—and we’ll file it under a different mood.

Thoughtful context in your message helps. Telling us what moment the song soundtracks—a night drive, a breakup, a quiet flex—gives us a clearer sense of where it might belong in future guides or playlist recipes.

What we don’t do

We are not a label, a management company, or a playlist pitching service. We cannot guarantee placements, listens, or industry introductions, and we do not sell spots in articles or lists. Our job is to curate and explain; your job is to keep making records that feel honest to you.

That separation keeps the recommendations here rooted in listening first, not in who has the biggest budget or marketing push.

Sending links that are easy to review

If you share your own music or a friend's project, direct links to official releases on major platforms are easiest for us to review. Short descriptions that mention tempo, mood, and key influences help us understand how you hear the record before we even press play.

Files that require unusual downloads or expired private links are more likely to get lost, so sticking to stable, public releases is usually the best route.

What to expect after you reach out

We read far more messages than we can reply to individually. When a suggestion fits a gap in an existing guide or sparks an idea for a new article, we save it into our running notes and may circle back later once we have spent time with the music.

If you do not hear back, it does not mean your message was ignored. It often means we are still listening and figuring out where, or whether, the recommendation belongs.

What constructive feedback looks like

Some of the most helpful messages we receive do more than say “you forgot X” or “this list is wrong.” They point to specific songs, moments, or projects and explain why they feel crucial to understanding a lane. That kind of detail gives us something concrete to listen for when we revisit an article.

When you frame feedback around examples instead of just opinions, you become part of the curation process rather than shouting from the sidelines.

What we can't promise to promote

Even if we love a record you share, we might not feature it immediately—or at all. Timing, fit, and editorial focus all play a role. A song can be strong on its own but not quite match the angle of a specific article or list we are updating.

Keeping that boundary clear protects the trust of readers who come here expecting honest recommendations rather than pay-to-play placements.

Respecting boundaries in conversation

Passionate opinions about music are welcome; harassment, spam, and discriminatory language are not. We reserve the right to ignore or block messages that cross those lines so that our time and attention can stay focused on constructive dialogue about the art itself.

Clear, respectful communication makes it more likely that we can actually hear what you are trying to say about the music you care about.

Collaboration ideas that help everyone

Occasionally, artists, writers, or curators reach out with collaboration ideas—joint playlists, guest essays, or breakdowns of specific records. When those concepts align with the site's focus and add clear value for listeners, they are more likely to move forward.

Proposals that center on genuine discovery and thoughtful commentary fit far better than requests for generic promo blasts.

Why replies can be slow even when we care

This project is often maintained alongside other work and life commitments, which means inbox time comes in bursts. You might send a thoughtful message on a week when we are deep in listening or drafting mode and not hear back until the next window opens up.

We appreciate patience and try to prioritize responses that add something new to the conversation rather than simply asking for promotion.

Details that help us actually help you

When you reach out with a question—whether you are an artist, a fan, or a curious listener—specifics make a big difference. Mention the page you were on, the line that confused you, or the song that made you reach for the contact form in the first place.

Those details turn a vague “please cover my music” into a conversation we can respond to with something more than a generic thanks.